Insectman Home
Presentations
Contact Us
My Testimony
Articles
Our Links
Get Saved
Exodus Mandate
The Lie: Evolution
 

Articles


Dawkins is Buggy

By Karl C. Priest 11-9-2008

According to the American Heritage Dictionary “buggy” is a synonym for “crazy “ and “crazy” means a disorder of the mind. That is an apt description of anyone who clings to belief in evolutionism especially after they are advised of the total lack of science behind Darwin’s dogma.

As Dr. Joseph Mastropaolo so aptly puts it: “Evolutionists are out of touch with reality and hallucinate that evolution is true. Such hallucinations, so withdrawn from reality, are the medical dictionary definition of psychosis because evolution is a fantasy, but not the usual straightforward kind of fantasy, like the cow jumped over the moon. It is an inverted fantasy, like the moon jumped over the cow.”

Dr. Richard Dawkins is a prime example of someone who fervently believes that the moon can jump over a cow. Dawkins is certifiably “buggy”.

To my knowledge, Dr. Dawkins has never published a peer reviewed article about evolution. That hasn’t stopped a steady stream of propaganda flowing from his deranged Darwinian mind. In The Blind Watchmaker, Dawkins devotes almost all of chapter three to a (not intended) hilarious description of a computer program he wrote which he believes demonstrates how natural selection works (see my article “Let’s Squash Natural Selection”).

His argument is dead before it hatches because he has to use a precisely designed computer to run a program that is based upon an intelligent design. Really buggy people do not allow details like reality to sway them so Dawkins proceeds to describe the program’s results.

By programming the computer to draw a vertical line and then follow programmed instructions to branch off in various ways (similar to a screen saver you may see on some computers) an observer can distinguish figures that resemble something recognizable (like looking a cloud formations).

Dawkins, acting as a god (though he would never admit it) chooses a preferred “creature” to survive and continue the “evolving” process. He (much to my delight) chose to call his “creatures” insects.

I could not do justice in describing the insanity of what happens during Dawkins’ creative process so I will let him mock himself in his own words.

“Nothing in my biologist’s intuition, nothing in my 20 years’ experience of programming computers, and nothing in my wildest dreams, prepared me for what actually emerged on the screen. I can’t remember exactly when in the sequence it first began to dawn on me that an evolved resemblance to something like an insect was possible. With a wild surmise, I began to breed, generation after generation, from whichever child looked most like an insect. My incredulity grew in parallel with the evolving resemblance…Admittedly they have eight legs like spiders, instead of six like an insect, but even so! I still cannot conceal from you my feeling of exultation as first I watched these exquisite creatures emerging before my eyes. I distinctly heard the triumphal opening chords of Also sprach Zarathustra (the ‘2001 theme’) in my mind. I couldn’t eat, and that night ‘my’ insects swarmed behind my eyelids as I tried to sleep.” (pgs. 59-60)

Folks, my 18 month old grandson can scribble a more realistic image of an insect!

The paragraph quoted above should provide much amusement for anyone with capable of using logic and common sense, but there is more.

On page 66 Dawkins refers to the “evolutionary creativity of natural selection, the blind watchmaker.” It’s not the watchmaker who is blind. Dawkins wouldn’t recognize reality it it was a wall six inches from his face!

To conclude the chapter, Dawkins hammers the final nail into his padded cell with, “When we are prevented from making a journey in reality, the imagination is not a bad substitute.” To which I would add, “When an evolutionist is unable to stretch his imagination he can easily travel into hallucination.”

And we allow public school students to be brain-washed with evolutionism generated from spaced out minds like that of Richard Dawkins!

If the above does not convince you Dawkins (and by association with him—all evolutionists) are buggy, then perhaps you have inhaled too much bug spray.

---------------------------------------------
For more about Dr. Richard Dawkins click HERE.